Skip to main content
HoldLens logoHoldLensConviction
Contrarian bets · where smart money is split

Where is smart money arguing?

220 tickers where ≥2 superinvestors were buying while ≥2 others were selling over the last 4 quarters. The active-disagreement signal.

Consensus bets are safer but less interesting. Contrarian bets are where one side of the smart-money trade is wrong — and when a consensus forms, it moves the price.

Free download — no signup.
Full list · top 20

Every active debate

Sorted by total disagreement activity. Click any ticker for the full conviction breakdown.

METAMeta Platforms
+3conviction
Buying (18)
Selling (10)
MSFTMicrosoft
−8conviction
AMZNAmazon
−8conviction
Buying (12)
GOOGLAlphabet
−26conviction
Buying (11)
TSMTaiwan Semi
−3conviction
UNHUnitedHealth
−25conviction
Selling (11)
VVisa
−14conviction
Selling (10)
BNBrookfield Corp
+12conviction
NVDANVIDIA
+8conviction
SEASEA
+1conviction
BABAAlibaba
+25conviction
Buying (7)
Selling (7)
INTUINTU
−20conviction
Buying (6)
VSTVistra Corp
+1conviction
GOOGAlphabet Class C
−1conviction
Buying (6)
Selling (8)
TMOTMO
−23conviction
Buying (6)
Selling (7)
IVVIVV
−19conviction
COFCapital One Financial
−17conviction
PFEPFE
−11conviction
FLUTFLUT
−5conviction
PDDPDD
−16conviction
Buying (4)
Selling (8)
Advertisement
Remove with Pro →
How we find contrarian bets

Overlap of buyers and sellers, last 4 quarters

We scan every distinct 13F move across the last 4 quarters ( Q1 2026, Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q2 2025) for each ticker. A ticker qualifies as contrarian if ≥2 superinvestors were buying (new or add) AND ≥2 others were selling (trim or exit) in the same window.

This is the inverse of /crowded-trades (where everyone is piled in the same direction). It’s also the signal Dataroma can’t show — their leaderboards don’t cross-tab buyers and sellers.

Contrarian bets carry high variance — one side of every disagreement is wrong. Not investment advice. Methodology.