META vs GRBK
Meta Platforms · Green Brick Partners
Superinvestor ownership overlap, unique holders, and conviction comparison.
What the ownership overlap reveals
Across 17 tracked superinvestors, no manager holds both META and GRBK — the two names draw on entirely separate pools of smart money. META appears in 15 tracked portfolios; GRBK in 2, so META is the more widely held of the two among tracked managers.
META is a Technology holding while GRBK sits in Real Estate — the overlap (or lack of it) partly tracks how each manager allocates across sectors. On the latest 13F cohort, META’s ConvictionScore reads +3 (slight accumulation) against GRBK’s +13 (slight accumulation); GRBK shows the stronger net-accumulation reading of the pair.
Descriptive comparison of SEC Form 13F filings (45-day reporting lag; filings can be 1–3 months old). Not investment advice — see methodology.
Ownership fingerprint
Who holds META only, who holds GRBK only, and who holds both.
- Chase Coleman13.4%
- Li Lu11.8%
- David Tepper9.1%
- Chris Hohn8.2%
- Jeffrey Ubben8.1%
- John Armitage7.2%
- Terry Smith6.5%
- Andreas Halvorsen6.4%
- +7 more
No manager holds both META and GRBK.
- David Einhorn28.7%
- Howard Marks9.4%
Frequently asked questions
Which has more hedge-fund owners: META or GRBK?
META (Meta Platforms) is held by 15 tracked superinvestors; GRBK (Green Brick Partners) is held by 2. META has 13 more tracked holders. Full ranking by % of portfolio in the table below.
What managers hold both META and GRBK?
0 tracked superinvestors hold both META and GRBK based on the latest SEC 13F filings. Full overlap table below.
What is the overlap between META and GRBK institutional ownership?
Across 17 unique tracked holders: 15 hold only META (88%), 0 hold both (0%), 2 hold only GRBK (12%). The full Venn split + per-manager position % is on this page.
Sourced from SEC 13F filings (2026). Not investment advice. Methodology.