GRBK vs META
Green Brick Partners · Meta Platforms
Superinvestor ownership overlap, unique holders, and conviction comparison.
What the ownership overlap reveals
Across 17 tracked superinvestors, no manager holds both GRBK and META — the two names draw on entirely separate pools of smart money. GRBK appears in 2 tracked portfolios; META in 15, so META is the more widely held of the two among tracked managers.
GRBK is a Real Estate holding while META sits in Technology — the overlap (or lack of it) partly tracks how each manager allocates across sectors. On the latest 13F cohort, GRBK’s ConvictionScore reads +13 (slight accumulation) against META’s +3 (slight accumulation); GRBK shows the stronger net-accumulation reading of the pair.
Descriptive comparison of SEC Form 13F filings (45-day reporting lag; filings can be 1–3 months old). Not investment advice — see methodology.
Ownership fingerprint
Who holds GRBK only, who holds META only, and who holds both.
- David Einhorn28.7%
- Howard Marks9.4%
No manager holds both GRBK and META.
- Chase Coleman13.4%
- Li Lu11.8%
- David Tepper9.1%
- Chris Hohn8.2%
- Jeffrey Ubben8.1%
- John Armitage7.2%
- Terry Smith6.5%
- Andreas Halvorsen6.4%
- +7 more
Frequently asked questions
Which has more hedge-fund owners: GRBK or META?
GRBK (Green Brick Partners) is held by 2 tracked superinvestors; META (Meta Platforms) is held by 15. META has 13 more tracked holders. Full ranking by % of portfolio in the table below.
What managers hold both GRBK and META?
0 tracked superinvestors hold both GRBK and META based on the latest SEC 13F filings. Full overlap table below.
What is the overlap between GRBK and META institutional ownership?
Across 17 unique tracked holders: 2 hold only GRBK (12%), 0 hold both (0%), 15 hold only META (88%). The full Venn split + per-manager position % is on this page.
Sourced from SEC 13F filings (2026). Not investment advice. Methodology.